RHS Corp. v. City of Boynton Beach
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHACK, LARRY, Associate Judge.
We affirm the order of the trial court dismissing count III of the amended complaint with prejudice. We write to briefly discuss two issues.
Count III of the amended complaint sought to compel the appellee, the City of Boynton Beach (the “City”), to inspect certain property and enforce its land development regulations against a private property owner. We agree with the trial court’s determination that mandamus is not available to compel such action. See Trianon Park Condominium Ass’n v. City of Hialeah, 468 So.2d 912 (Fla.1985) (the enforcement of the law by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Hatten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Town of Manalapan v. RechlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Delia & Wilson, Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Chaires v. North Florida Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Detournay v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Thomas v. Hospital Board of Directors of Lee CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- James v. CrewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Thomas v. HOSP. BD. OF DIRS. OF LEE COUNTYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- MAVERICK MEDIA GROUP v. Dept. of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.