Legal Opinion

City of Miami Beach v. State, Ex Rel. Epicure, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 7, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This appeal was taken by the City of Miami Beach from an order granting a peremptory writ of mandamus.

Defendant in error instituted an action of mandamus against the City of Miami Beach to coerce the issuance of a license to sell liquor. The amended alternative writ revealed that the locus in quo was zoned against the sale of liquor. Relator alleged however, that he expended a great amount of money for lease of the premises and bar equipment upon the assurance being given by a majority of the City Council that the zoning restriction would be altered to allow him to procure a license. It is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. L. Maxcy, Inc. v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. State ex rel. MayorSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  4. State Ex Rel. Allen v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. State ex rel. Sunday v. RichardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Coral Gables v. State Ex Rel. WorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Centrust Savings Bank v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. City of Miami Beach v. Atheneum, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. State ex rel. Holland v. City of Eau GallieSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API