Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Taylor

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1976No. 14399PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff initiated this action, alleging she was employed by defendant as a real estate broker, to engage in the sale of condominium units owned by Treasure Mountain Corporation. She claimed she acted as a real estate broker, at the request of defendant; performed all duties as such; and defendant was indebted to her for the reasonable value of her services, work, and labor in her capacity as a real estate broker. She alleged that a reasonable and customary amount, to be awarded for such services, was one per cent of the total sales made during the period she was so employed.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baugh v. DarleyUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Reilly v. MawMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rapp v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Anderson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Brown v. Yacht Club of Coeur D'Alene, Ltd.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. MacHan Hampshire Properties, Inc. v. Western Real Estate & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. Williams v. SingletonUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hess v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Soundvision Technologies, LLC v. Templeton Group Ltd.District Court, D. Utah · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API