Williams v. Singleton
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants. The trial court found that no binding agreement had been reached between the parties under an earnest money receipt and offer to purchase (the contract) and that defendants were entitled to the return of their earnest money deposit. We affirm.
On appeal from a summary judgment, we review the evidence in a light most favorable to the losing party. Geneva Pipe Co. v. S & H Insurance Co., 714 P.2d 648 (Utah 1986). Summary judgment is proper if the movant is entitled to it as a matter of law on the undisputed facts. Utah R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- McKibben v. Mohawk Oil Co., Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Bradshaw v. McBrideUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Coombs v. OuzounianUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- Le Vine v. WhitehouseUtah Supreme Court · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commercial Union Associates v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Krantz v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- C.J. Realty, Inc. v. WilleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Verdi Energy Group, Inc v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Wasatch Oil & Gas, LLC v. Edward A. ReottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.