Legal Opinion

Branham v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided August 27, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 3:92-0667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

TAYLOR, United States Magistrate Judge.

In the context of organizations represented by counsel, commentary appended to Rule 4.2 of West Virginia’s Rules of Professional *68Conduct1 prohibits communication by counsel “for one party concerning the matter in representation with persons having a managerial responsibility on behalf of the organization, and with any other person whose act or omission in connection with that matter may be imputed to the organization for purposes of civil or criminal liability or whose statement may constitute an admission on the part of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. James E. Hendley v. Central of Georgia Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. McCallum v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shane Weibrecht v. Southern Illinois Transfer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Terra International, Inc. v. Mississippi Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  3. Armsey v. Medshares Management Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RR. v. O'MalleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Cole v. Appalachian Power Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API