Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Madsen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is 'an appeal from a judgment of foreclosure. The appellants demand a trial anew.

There is no substantial controversy as to the facts. In December, 1915 the defendant Madsen owned a quarter section of land in Mc-Henry county. He borrowed $850.00 of L. A. Crowell of Ruso, payable December 23, 1920, at the Eirst State Bank of Ruso, and secured the same by first mortgage on his land. The interest was payable annually and was evidenced by coupon notes. Crowell was the president of the First State Bank of Ruso, hereinafter referred to- as the Ruso bank. Madsen sold the land subject to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Harrison v. LegoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Security State Bank v. SouleMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Murphy v. W. H. & F. W. Cane, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Sioux City Cattle Loan Co. v. LovrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farmers Union Oil Co. of Dickinson v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Meyer v. National Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Weber v. Towner CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  4. Pfliger v. Peavey Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hagel v. Buckingham Wood Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API