Legal Opinion

Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 25, 1983No. 82-2277PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This appeal raises the apparently novel question of whether an agency’s statement that it lacks statutory jurisdiction to enforce one of its regulations against another agency is a legislative “rule” whose issuance may only follow the formal notice and comment procedures of 5 U.S.C. §§ 553(b) and (c). We hold that it is not. Alternatively, we are asked to decide that the specific jurisdictional interpretation rendered by the agency here was unreasonable; we decline to do so.

I

This case arises from the Interstate Commerce Commission’s interpretation of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Energy Consumers & Producers Ass'n v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Andrew Kenny v. Robert E. Hampton, Chairman, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Medical Ass'n v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1985
  2. Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DIST. OF WAYNE TP. v. DavilaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
  4. William T. Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. Sandor, Mortgage Services of America v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. SandorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API