Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.
Circuit Judge ROBB concurs in the result.
WALD, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners seek review of a decision1 by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) to grant a certificate of public convenience and necessity to Great Plains Gasification Associates (“Great Plains”) pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717 et seq. The certificate was issued to facilitate the construction and operation of a coal gasification plant which Great Plains wishes to build in Mercer County, North Dakota. We hold that FERC lacked jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United Nuclear Corp. v. CannonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1982
- Davidson v. District of Columbia Board of MedicineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Public Utilities Commission Of The State Of Colorado v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- State of Mo. v. AndrewsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.