Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
The principal question raised by this petition for review is whether the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC” or “Commission”) has authority to entertain counterclaims not alleging violations of the Commodity Exchange Act1 (“CEA” or “Act”) or CFTC regulations. Article III concerns impel us to construe the Act to deny the Commission that authority.
Petitioners William T. Schor and Mortgage Services of America (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Schor”) filed complaints with the Commission seeking…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sun West Distributors, Inc. v. Grumman Energy System Co. (In Re Sun West Distributors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1987
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Bokum Resources Corp. (In Re Bokum Resources Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1986
- Sinclair & Co., Inc. v. GuruleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- William T. Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. Sandor, Mortgage Services of America v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and Conticommodity Services, Inc. And Richard L. SandorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.