Legal Opinion

Southwest Cotton Co. v. Clements

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1923No. Civil No. 2064PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellant in its motion for a rehearing, after reminding ns that we had held this instruction, “The jury are instructed that the defense of contributory negligence is not available against a child or one not having attained the years of discretion,” did not correctly state the law, proceeds to show us from the record that, contrary to our conclusion, this instruction must have been given to the jury. The contention is based upon the fact that it appears as a part of the reporter’s transcript and is certified by the judge as correct, and upon the further fact that appellee’s counsel did…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Akin v. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Schoonover v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. De Amado v. FriedmanArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Baker v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Hobbs v. George W. Blanchard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Butane Corporation v. KirbyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gilbert v. QuinetArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Sax v. KopelmanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Tenney v. EnkeballArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Buckeye Irrigation Co. v. AskrenArizona Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API