Legal Opinion

Sax v. Kopelman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1964No. 7350PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Justice.

Appellants were defendants in a suit arising out of an automobile accident. During the course of the trial the defendants made motions for a directed verdict and, after a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, made motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial. All of these motions were denied and defendants appeal from the judgment against them.

At 8:00 A.M. on the morning of the accident defendant Beverley Sax, daughter of the other two defendants took the older of two family cars to drive a friend to school. The car was a 1951 Lincoln. Beverley drove east on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Davis v. WeberArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Humphrey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Davidson v. WeeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Egurrola v. SzychowskiArizona Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. Kauffman v. SchroederArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. City of Phoenix v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. First National Bank of Arizona v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API