Legal Opinion

Clarke-Gravely Corp. v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1982No. 63743, (Calendar No. 4)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

The facts of this case are accurately stated in Justice Fitzgerald’s opinion. We agree with his view that the tax commissioner has broad discretionary power to require or permit combined reporting. Consequently, we agree that plaintiffs’ right to interest on the refunds generated by the 1972 and 1973 amended returns extends only from the time the tax commissioner accepted those amended returns.

However, we do not agree that "[c]ombined reporting is a unique matter outside the scope of the statute of limitations and the tolling provisions”. MCL 206.411; MSA 7.557(1411) and MCL 206.441; MSA…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clarke-Gravely Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Santander Consumer USA Inc v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Donovan Construction Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Guardian Industries Corp. v. DEP'T OF TREASURY CARGILL, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Holloway Sand and Gravel Co. Inc. v. Dept. of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API