Driscoll v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
This appeal is from a conviction of abduction of an eighteen year old girl who is named in the indictment for the purpose of prostitution, Code Section 10790, with the maximum punishment fixed at five years’ imprisonment.
After Driscoll had entered a plea of not guilty and the jury had been impaneled, he made a motion to quash the indictment because it failed (1) to charge that this girl was in the legal custody of her parents, or (2) that she was an unmarried person, or (3) that she was under twenty-one years of age. The action of the Court below in overruling this motion is assigned as error.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Pope v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Griffin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Holder v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- South v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Letner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
- Carl Kimbro v. Lynn Bomar, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Batey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
- Norris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.