Legal Opinion

Banks v. City of North Little Rock

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided August 2, 1988No. LR-C-88-87PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EISELE, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. Defendant has responded. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion will be granted.

Plaintiffs, employed as captains with the North Little Rock, Arkansas fire department seek to recover overtime wages on behalf of themselves and other consenting employees similiarly situated. Plaintiffs allege that since April 15, 1986, defendant has willfully and unlawfully denied plaintiffs overtime premiums due under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1). Defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. The Claridge Hotel and CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Knecht v. City of Redwood CityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wegner v. Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  2. Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Abshire v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API