Richardson v. N.W.R. Co. of S.C.

May 8, 1923.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by The appellants' attorney relies upon four propositions for a new trial, which are as follows:

"(1) It was error to allow the amendment to the answer.

"(2) Testimony as to experiments was incompetent.

"(3) It was error to refuse a new trial when experiments were made before the jury, in the absence of the Judge.

"(4) The charge of the Court was erroneous in point of law, and was a charge on the facts."

The propositions numbered 1, 2, and 3 involve questions that were addressed to the discretion of his Honor, the presiding Judge, and are not the…