Legal Opinion

Estacada Rural Fire District 69 v. Hull

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 2013No. 0801504; A148377PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

At issue in this case is whether claimant’s stress-related heart attack must be analyzed under the so-called firefighters’ presumption of ORS 656.802(4) or instead, under the heightened standard of proof for mental disorders found in ORS 656.802(3). The Workers’ Compensation Board (board) applied the firefighters’ presumption, and employer seeks judicial review. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

The facts, as found by the administrative law judge (AL J) and adopted by the board, are supported by substantial evidence. Claimant is a fire district chief and has worked for employer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Severy v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. City of Eugene v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NeesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Intel Corp. v. BatchlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API