Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Stout

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1937No. File No. 8114PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert'S, J.

This action was brought to' enjoin the defendants, their agents, representatives, and successors in office, from enforcing or attempting to enforce against the plaintiffs and others similarly situated the collection of a tax imposed upon all stocks of liquor in the possession or under the control of retail dealers on July 1/19137, by the provisions of chapter 146, Laws 1937. The court held that this statute is constitutional and sustained the demurrer to the complaint. Plaintiffs appeal.

The determination of the constitutionality of the statute in question requires an analysis of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. WelshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lionel's Cigar Store v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. West India Oil Co. v. GallardoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  5. City of Pierre v. SiewertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. HarstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Schmitt v. NordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Roseland v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. City of Pierre v. StoutSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rutledge v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API