Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 16, 1984No. 64460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

445 So.2d 1007 (1984)

Gary RUTLEDGE, et al., Appellants,

v.

Herbert W. CHANDLER, et al., Appellees.

No. 64460.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Order December 6, 1983.

Opinion February 16, 1984.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1984.

Harold F.X. Purnell, General Counsel, Dept. of Business Regulation, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Thomas F. Woods of Woods & Carlson, Tallahassee, for appellees.

Mark Herron, Laurel D. Landry and Sandra M. Anderson, Tallahassee, for The Florida House of Representatives, Representative H. Lee Moffitt and Representative Barry Kutun, amicus curiae.

Arnold D. Levine and George H. Sheldon of…

Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Jerome H. Sheip Co. v. AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Herman v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. City of Deland v. Florida Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Smith v. the City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campus Communications v. Dept. of Rev.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. METRO. DADE CTY. v. Golden Nugget GroupDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco v. Florida Restaurant Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API