Legal Opinion

City of Pierre v. Siewert

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. Files Nos. 7832-33PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff city, a municipal corporation of the second class, alleging full compliance on its part with section 43, c. 134, Laws 1935 (Senate Bill 168 of the Twenty-Fourth Legislative Session, commonly referred to as “The Intoxicating Liquor Law”), instituted two original proceedings in this court for the purpose of requiring defendants to issue to plaintiff two separate licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor at retail as contemplated) by section 4 of the act. Case No. 7832 seeks to compel the issuance of a class C license, being an off sale or package dealer’s license, and case No. 7833…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State Ex Rel. Botkin v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arens v. Village of RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Independent Community Bankers Ass'n of South Dakota v. State Ex Rel. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Kornmann v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Jensen v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Culhane v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API