Legal Opinion

Catina v. Hudson Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 43, Calendar No. 38,061PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

On October 22, 1926, plaintiff, Sam Catina, while working on a punch press for defend ant Hudson Motor Car Company, sustained severe injuries -when struck by a jack weighing 150 pounds. Following the filing of a report with the department of labor and industry, an agreement was entered into between plaintiff and his employer’s insurer, defendant Michigan Mutual Liability Company, providing for the payment of $14 a week compensation during total' disability. On May 23, 1927, a supplemental agreement was entered into between plaintiff and the insurer, by which compensation was reduced to $3.83…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McKay v. Jackson & Tindle, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Norbut v. I. Stephenson Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Runnels v. Allied Engineers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Johnston's Administrator v. United AirlinesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Wehmeier v. W. E. Wood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kiviniemi v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API