Solo v. Chrysler Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The plaintiff applies for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals decision affirming the trial judge’s entry of summary judgment for the defendant. This case presents the question whether an allegation that the redemption of a workers’ cbmpenSation claim was based on mutual mistake of a fact states a ciaim for which relief may be granted. The courts below held that it did not. We disagree and reverse.
I
Josephine Solo was injured in a work-related accident on February 18, 1969. Chrysler Corporation voluntarily paid benefits until she returned to work on April 21, 1969. Mrs. Solo stopped…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. Strom Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Panozzo v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnston's Administrator v. United AirlinesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Catina v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Ryan v. AlexyMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clifton Jackson v. Sedgwick Claims Management Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Beardslee v. Michigan Claim Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Merrill v. Eastland Woolen Mills, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Solo v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.