McKay v. Jackson & Tindle, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.
Prior to December 21, 1931, plaintiff was an able-bodied man and able to do such manual labor as might be required from a man employed in lumbering. On the above date and while so employed by defendant Jackson & Tindle, Inc., in cutting a road through to some logs, a tree fell upon him, striking his head, back, arm and shoulders. By agreement filed and approved January 23, 1932, plaintiff was to be paid compensation at the rate of $7 -per week during the period of total disability, based on the fact that his average weekly wage was $7.86.
June 16, 1932, defendants filed a petition to stop…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Estate of Beckwith v. SpoonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. Pontiac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Catina v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Dunavant v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Barry v. Peterson Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Runnels v. Allied Engineers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.