Legal Opinion

McKay v. Jackson & Tindle, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 46, Calendar No. 37,706PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

Prior to December 21, 1931, plaintiff was an able-bodied man and able to do such manual labor as might be required from a man employed in lumbering. On the above date and while so employed by defendant Jackson & Tindle, Inc., in cutting a road through to some logs, a tree fell upon him, striking his head, back, arm and shoulders. By agreement filed and approved January 23, 1932, plaintiff was to be paid compensation at the rate of $7 -per week during the period of total disability, based on the fact that his average weekly wage was $7.86.

June 16, 1932, defendants filed a petition to stop…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of Beckwith v. SpoonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Pontiac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Catina v. Hudson Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dunavant v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Barry v. Peterson Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Runnels v. Allied Engineers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API