Legal Opinion

State v. Markland

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 2, 2004No. 20020965-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*241MEMORANDUM DECISION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

¶ 1 David Markland, Defendant, was charged with possession of methamphetamine, a third degree felony, and with possession of marijuana, a class B misdemeanor. See Utah' Code Ann. § 58-37-8(2)(a)(i) (2002). Defendant moved to suppress the evidence, arguing that his detention was not supported by reasonable suspicion and the ensuing search was therefore illegal. The trial court denied the motion to suppress and Defendant petitioned for an interlocutory appeal, which this court granted. The issue before this court is whether the trial court properly denied…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. State v. DeitmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  5. Salt Lake City v. RayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MarklandUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. MarklandUtah Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API