Legal Opinion

State v. Markland

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2005No. 20040190PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

¶ 1 In this case, we must determine whether David Roger Markland’s constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated when a police officer detained him in order to run a five-minute warrants cheek. At issue is whether Markland’s detention was justified by a reasonable suspicion that Markland had engaged, was engaged, or was about to engage in criminal activity. The district court concluded that Markland’s detention was justified. However, in a 2-1 opinion, the Utah Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the detention was unlawful because…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Golphin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Swift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. State v. AlverezUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API