State v. Markland
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
¶ 1 In this case, we must determine whether David Roger Markland’s constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated when a police officer detained him in order to run a five-minute warrants cheek. At issue is whether Markland’s detention was justified by a reasonable suspicion that Markland had engaged, was engaged, or was about to engage in criminal activity. The district court concluded that Markland’s detention was justified. However, in a 2-1 opinion, the Utah Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the detention was unlawful because…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Golphin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Swift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. AlverezUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.