Legal Opinion

Nettles v. Tillson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1937No. 8239PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

In the District Court the verdict was directed for the defendant because the plaintiff failed to prove his case. Nettles, as receiver for the Peoples State Bank of South Carolina, had sued Marie A. Till-son, as executrix of Elizabeth B. McCarter, to recover $3,300 as the double liability of the deceased on 330 shares of stock in the failed bank. She denied the allegation of the declaration that the deceased at the time of her death was the holder of 330 shares of its stock. The only evidence offered was a stub in a book claimed to be the Bank’s stock certificate book…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Evanston v. GunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Turnbull v. PaysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hardesty v. CorrothersDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1940
  2. Nettles v. WalcottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API