Legal Opinion

Estate of Kuhns v. Marco

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 20, 2000No. 99-0930PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

In this appeal, we must decide if Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 69(e) requires a defendant to receive notice of the action prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations before an amendment to the petition to add a plaintiff may be deemed to relate back to the original petition when the action was filed prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. The district court concluded notice was required to be received prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations and entered summary judgment for the defendant. The court of appeals affirmed. We vacate the decision…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Ezzone v. RiccardiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rieff v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Rathje v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. Frontier Leasing Corp. v. Links Engineering, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  4. Brett Noble v. Iowa District Court for Muscatine CountyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
  5. Alexa Anthony v. 60th Street III, L.C. and Professional Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API