Ezzone v. Riccardi
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
Appeals are routinely controlled by our scope of review. This case, involving a surprising jury verdict, is a classic example. Plaintiffs, formerly husband and wife, recovered substantial verdicts following a disastrous manufacturing venture. Defendants, who consider themselves to be innocent financial backers, are convinced plaintiffs’ financial wounds were either self-inflicted or caused by the employee they themselves selected. This employee, a defendant who did not attend trial, is severely chastised by all parties for his duplicity in the events leading to this dispute.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Nesler v. Fisher and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Condon Auto Sales & Service, Inc. v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Wilson v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.