Legal Opinion

Ezzone v. Riccardi

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1994No. 93-855PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

Appeals are routinely controlled by our scope of review. This case, involving a surprising jury verdict, is a classic example. Plaintiffs, formerly husband and wife, recovered substantial verdicts following a disastrous manufacturing venture. Defendants, who consider themselves to be innocent financial backers, are convinced plaintiffs’ financial wounds were either self-inflicted or caused by the employee they themselves selected. This employee, a defendant who did not attend trial, is severely chastised by all parties for his duplicity in the events leading to this dispute.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Nesler v. Fisher and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Condon Auto Sales & Service, Inc. v. CrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Wilson v. IBP, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API