Miami Copper Co. v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County'of Gila. G. W. Shute, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, J.
This action, being in the nature of an action of debt, was instituted by the state of Arizona in the superior court to recover a penalty under chapter 50, Laws of 1912, Regular Session. The act provides:
*181“Section 1. That the business of conducting and operating an electric light plant, or any electric power plant, is hereby declared to be hazardous and dangerous to those employed therein.
'“Sec. 2. That it shall be unlawful for any person, corporation or association operating or managing any electric light plant, or any electric power plant, or both, within this state, to permit, or cause to be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Stockwell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- MEREDITH v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Galvan, Gilbert W. v. Fed Pris Indust IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Petty Et Ux. v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Carroll v. Housing Opportunities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Shelby-Downard Asphalt Co. v. EnyartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.