Legal Opinion

MEREDITH v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1839PublishedCited by 92 opinions

IN error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Maryland. TheUnited States instituted an action of assumpsit against Jonathan Meredith and Thomas Ellicott, to recover from them, as the assignees of Samuel Smith, James A. Buchanan, and Thomas A. Buchanan, formerly trhding as merchants under the firm of S. Smith and Buchanan, a certain amount due to the -United States for duties; the United States' claiming a right of priority of payment against the…

Read the full summary

IN error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Maryland. TheUnited States instituted an action of assumpsit against Jonathan Meredith and Thomas Ellicott, to recover from them, as the assignees of Samuel Smith, James A. Buchanan, and Thomas A. Buchanan, formerly trhding as merchants under the firm of S. Smith and Buchanan, a certain amount due to the -United States for duties; the United States' claiming a right of priority of payment against the estate in the hands of the trustees. The deed of trust tó the plaintiffs in error was executed by S. Smith and Buchanan,…

1Opinion of the Court

.Mr. Justice- Story

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court for the district of Maryland; The original action was assumpsit brought by the United States against the plaintiffs in error, who were the original defendants, to recover from them,as assignees' under a general assignment of the property of the firm of Smith and Buchanan, the .amount of certain duties alleged, to be due from the said firm upon certain importations in the. brig Unicorn and. the ship Brazilian, out of the funds in the hands of the assignees, upon, the ground of an asserted .right…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. The United States v. Vowell and M'cleanSupreme Court of the United States · 1809

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Bernard Damsky, Olga Damsky and Henry Birns v. Honorable Joseph C. Zavatt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API