Legal Opinion
Taylor v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 21, 1993No. 80988PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUNTER, Presiding Judge:
Appellee Jimmy L. Taylor filed a claim for unemployment benefits, which was denied by the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC). Taylor appealed to OESC’s Appeal Tribunal, which, upon de novo review, also denied benefits. Taylor appealed the decision to the Board of Review, which affirmed the denial of benefits. Taylor then timely sought judicial review in district court as provided in 40 O.S.1991 § 2-610. Taylor named OESC and his former employer, Riverside Nissan, as defendants, but failed to name the Board of Review as required by Section 2-610. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edmondson v. Siegfried Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Hayhurst v. HayhurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- District Court for Seventeenth Judicial District v. Board of Review for Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Meek v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Patterson v. BeallCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Williams v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.