Legal Opinion
Williams v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 2, 1995No. 82387PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARL B. JONES, Judge:
Appellant Claude Williams made a claim for unemployment benefits after he was discharged from his job as a mail carrier for the United States Postal Service. The Postal Service objected to his claim, asserting Appellant had been discharged for misconduct connected with his work. The Oklahoma Employment Security Commission [“Commission”] agreed and denied Appellant’s claim. Appellant unsuccessfully sought re-, versal of that decision by proceedings before the Commission’s Appeal Tribunal and Board of Review.
On July 19, 1991, within the time provided by 40…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edmondson v. Siegfried Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Taylor v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- District Court for Seventeenth Judicial District v. Board of Review for Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robinson v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Higgins v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Robinson v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997