Legal Opinion

Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 15, 2010No. 107,100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.

" 1 The primary issue on appeal is whether failure to name the Board of Review ("Board") of the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission ("OESC"), as a party to an appeal brought under 40 0.8. Supp.2008, § 2-610, requires the dismissal of the action for failure to name a necessary party. We have previously addressed this issue in Edmondson v. Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc., 1978 OK 45, 577 P.2d 72, and Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. Carter, 1995 OK 74, 903 P.2d 868. In both cases, we regarded the failure to name the Board as a fatal, jurisdictional flaw. This case is no different.

*923BACKG…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edmondson v. Siegfried Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Taylor v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  2. LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
  3. LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API