Legal Opinion

Sanfilippo v. County of Santa Cruz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 28, 1976No. C-75-675 SWPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.

This is an action for inverse, condemnation. Plaintiffs are owners of 206 acres of unimproved mountain land in Santa Cruz County., . They allege that the County’s General Plan and zoning scheme, as applied to their land, deprive them of their property without just compensation in violation of the 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution. The case, is presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons given below, the Court denies this motion.

The parties are in agreement as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southpark Square Limited, a Mississippi Corporation v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, State Highway Department of the State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. Electri-Tech, Inc. v. H F Campbell Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator ConstructorsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
  4. Ohland v. City of MontpelierDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1979
  5. Pan Pacific Properties, Inc. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API