Branton v. McLaughlin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action- in the district court for Ramsey county -to recover $1,500 damages for defendant’s failure to tarn over to plaintiff his practice as physician and surgeon for a certain railroad as agreed in his contract. The substance of the pleadings is stated in the opinion. From an order, Hallam, J., overruling defendant’s demurrer to the reply, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggarjd, J.
Plaintiff and respondent brought this action to recover $1,500 with interest, from defendant and appellant.
The complaint set forth: Defendant, a physician and surgeon, represented to plaintiff that he (defendant) had a large and lucrative business as a physician and surgeon in a named place; that he had been appointed by a named railroad company as its physician and surgeon at that place, which appointment defendant offered to and would sell and turn over to plaintiff. This was a considerable part of the business, -and worth. $1,500. The other part of his business, together with certain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First National Bank v. HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Baldwin v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Bausman v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Bjelos v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Keith v. KeithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910