First National Bank v. How
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Scott county, Macdonald, J., presiding, overruling its demurrer to the separate answers of the defendants D. L. How and Sanford A. Hooper, who were impleaded with Henry Nathan.
1Opinion of the Court
Mitchell, J.*
Appeal from an order overruling demurrers to the several answers of defendants Hooper and How. The action .is brought by plaintiff, as a creditor of the estate of George Nathan, upon the official bond of Henry Nathan, executor of the last will and testament of said George Nathan, which bond the other defendants, Hooper and How, had executed as sureties. The action is claimed to have been brought by leave of the probate court under the provisions of Gen. St. 1878; c. 55, § 5, which reads as follows: “When it appears, on the representation of any person interested in the estate,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stoddard v. Onondaga Annual Conference of the Methodist Protestant ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by8 opinions
- Warner v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Alansky v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Metz v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
- Branton v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.