Legal Opinion
Kendall v. Young
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 8, 1891Published
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.
Appellant and appellee made a contract containing the following provisions:
“Topeka, Kas., Nov. 15, 1884.
“ The following agreement is this day made between C. F. Kendall, of Topeka, Kansas, party of the first part, and Chas. E. Young, of Paw Paw, Mich., party of the second part. The party of the first part hereby agrees to sell to the party of the second part, all of his merchandise and fixtures now in store No. 204 Kansas Ave., Topeka, excepting counters, shelving and upright show-case (these to he included in rent of store), all of said goods and fixtures to be invoiced at cost and as agreed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kadish v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- W. R. Danforth & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
- Bagley v. FindlayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Lewis v. . GreiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Saladin v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.