Legal Opinion

McDougal v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 2003No. 2-02-281-CRPublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Appellant Michael Rennie McDougal was charged by indictment with theft under $1,500, enhanced by two prior theft convictions as well as two other prior felony convictions. Appellant signed a judicial confession and waived a reporter’s record. Upon his open plea of guilty to theft and true to the enhancement paragraphs, the trial court found the enhancement allegations true and convicted Appellant of state jail felony theft, 1 enhancing his punishment to that given for a second-degree felony. 2 The court sentenced Appellant to seven years’ confinement in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Rowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  5. Shields v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Chindaphone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Vanderburg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012
  4. Andrew Taney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Andrew Taney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API