Legal Opinion

Abushaabam v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 29, 1993No. B14-92-00050-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION ON REMAND

SEARS, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance. His punishment was assessed at ten years probation and a one-thousand dollar fine. On original submission, we reversed the case and ordered an acquittal, because there was insufficient non-accomplice witness testimony to support the conviction. Abu-Shabaam v. State, 848 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993). The State had main*593tained that this Court was unable to review the sufficiency of the evidence because Appellant had failed to include the statement of facts from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Abu-Shabaam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Abushaabam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. Burks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  4. Anthony Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  5. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API