Abushaabam v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION ON REMAND
SEARS, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance. His punishment was assessed at ten years probation and a one-thousand dollar fine. On original submission, we reversed the case and ordered an acquittal, because there was insufficient non-accomplice witness testimony to support the conviction. Abu-Shabaam v. State, 848 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993). The State had main*593tained that this Court was unable to review the sufficiency of the evidence because Appellant had failed to include the statement of facts from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Abu-Shabaam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Abushaabam v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Burks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
- Anthony Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.