Legal Opinion
Singer v. A. Hollander & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 30, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 1033-49PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Philip A. Singer, in his complaint, sets forth, among other things, the following allegations:
Upon the failure of a corporation of which he and his brother were co-owners, the defendant, A. Hollander & Son, Inc., in November of 1939 accepted plaintiff’s oral proposal to take charge of the plant of defendant in Long Branch, New Jersey at a *72salary of $150 per week and proceed to process rabbit furs using formulae devised and owned by the plaintiff; that a written contract of employment, dated February 10, 1940, and running until December 31, 1944, was presented to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- A. Hollander & Son, Inc. v. Imperial Fur Blending Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Gardella v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- In Re CarubaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Singer v. A. Hollander & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953