Legal Opinion

Singer v. A. Hollander & Son, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 27, 1953No. 10855PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This suit under the federal antitrust statutes 1 marks another battle in a long internecine war carried on between the parties. 2 No doubt the fact that the litigants stem from common ancestors has added zest to the contest in their various legal jousts.

The facts which are the background of this particular piece of litigation have been stated so many times that we shall not waste good printers’ ink and law library shelf space by a long recital of them. They were fully stated and considered by Judge Forman in the district court 110 F.Supp. 71, and were likewise set out…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Meier v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  2. Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. Synanon Church v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Credit Bureau Reports, Inc. v. Retail Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. The United States of America v. The Russell Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API