Commonwealth v. Cahill
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
WECHT, J.:
In this case, we confront the heretofore unanswered question of whether a token is a ticket. We do so for the purpose of reviewing appellant John Cahill’s conviction for the summary offense of unauthorized sale or transfer of tickets — disposition by passenger, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6910(b). For the reasons that follow, we must conclude that a token is not a ticket. Consequently, we vacate Cahill’s March 11, 2013 judgment of sentence, which was imposed after he was convicted under subsection 6910(b) for attempting to sell tokens.
On November 2, 2012, Southeastern Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EsteppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. GiordanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Miller v. St. Luke's Univ. Health NetworkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. Bathurst, G., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.