Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cahill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 2014PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

In this case, we confront the heretofore unanswered question of whether a token is a ticket. We do so for the purpose of reviewing appellant John Cahill’s conviction for the summary offense of unauthorized sale or transfer of tickets — disposition by passenger, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6910(b). For the reasons that follow, we must conclude that a token is not a ticket. Consequently, we vacate Cahill’s March 11, 2013 judgment of sentence, which was imposed after he was convicted under subsection 6910(b) for attempting to sell tokens.

On November 2, 2012, Southeastern Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EsteppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TejadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. GiordanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Miller v. St. Luke's Univ. Health NetworkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Bathurst, G., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API