Legal Opinion
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 29, 1995No. Civil A. 83-207 LONPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
I. NATURE AND STAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
This is the opinion relative to the damages phase of an action for patent infringement originally filed by Plaintiff Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) against Defendant Amoco Chemical Company (“Amoco”). Docket Item (“D.I.”) 1. At a trial on the issues of infringement, willful infringement, validity and enforceability of Mobil’s U.S. Patent Nos. 3,702,886 (“the ’886 patent”); Re. 29,857 (“the ’857 patent”); 3,856,872 (“the ’872 patent”); and 4,049,573 (“the ’573 patent”), D.I. 240 at 1-3, ¶ 7, the Court found that Mobil’s patents were…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wendy's International, Inc. v. Nu-Cape Construction, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- WR Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Intercat, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Seal-Flex, Inc. v. WR Dougherty and Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.