Legal Opinion

Kurant v. Kent Probate Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1943No. Calendar No. 42,241PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Litigation involving the Svitojus estate has been before the court in Svitojus v. Kurant, 293 Mich. 291, In re Svitojus’ Estate, 296 Mich. 19, and Smolenski v. Kent Probate Judge, 301 Mich. 8. For a full understanding of the background of this action, we refer to the opinions containing over 90 pages in those cases. In the present case certiorari is sought to review and have vacated an order of mandamus of the Kent circuit court directing Clark E. Higbee, judge of probate for the county of Kent, to vacate an order made on April 11, 1941, in the matter of the estate of Joseph Svitojus,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lothrop v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lane v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Smolenski v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Svitojus v. KurantMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Messer TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re of ReedyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. In Re Svitojus' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Old Kent Bank v. Remainder BeneficiariesMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API