Old Kent Bank v. Remainder Beneficiaries
Michigan Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWeaver, J.
I agree with the majority’s holding that trustee prudence is not an issue triable by a jury. I write separately because I disagree with its reasoning in support of that conclusion. I also disagree with the majority’s holding that trustee good faith is an issue for the jury. I would hold that, with respect to inter *389vivos trusts, both trustee prudence and trustee good faith are matters for the judge, not the jury, under the Revised Probate Code, MCL 700.1 et seq.; MSA 27.5001 et seq.
The question presented, whether these remainder beneficiaries of an inter vivos trust have a right to a jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abner A. Wolf, Inc. v. WalchMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Van Etten v. MANUF. NAT'L BANK OF DETROITMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Chambers v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Detroit Trust Co. v. BlakelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Kurant v. Kent Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1943