Legal Opinion

Lothrop v. Duffield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1903No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by George Van Ness Lothrop and others, infants, by their next friend, Isabella G. B. Lothrop, against Henry M. Duffield, to set aside an order of the probate court, and for an injunction. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, C., J.

The complainants comprise several infants and their guardian. They file this bill to set aside an order made by the judge of probate allowing to the defendant a sum therein mentioned as attorney’s fees for services rendered in relation to securing for the complainants, from other descendants of their common ancestor, a *486concession by which their shares of the grandfather’s estate were materially increased. The petition is entitled in the estate of the minors, and prays the allowance to the petitioner of reasonable compensation for his services. It states briefly the nature of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Thacher v. DinsmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  2. Forster v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Rollins v. MarshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  4. Sanford v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Myers v. CohnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Woodman v. Kera LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Quinney's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. McGovern v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Berdan v. Milwaukee Mutual Life-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. In Re Dzwonkiewicz's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API