Legal Opinion

State v. Kibler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1969PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of concealing stolen property. He appeals and assigns three errors. We will consider them in the order assigned. To understand them, a .summary of the evidence is necessary.

The defendant was engaged in the business of buying and selling green salted hides. He dealt with a number of both buyers and sellers over a wide geographical area. He was a small operator with no set place of business apart from his residence in Klamath Falls. He owned and generally used a pickup truck in his business, but upon occasion would rent a larger truck.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GoldsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State of Oregon v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. StaceyOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. AlbertOregon Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LehmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. State v. MaganaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. MunizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API