Legal Opinion
State v. Stacey
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
The defendant, William Stacey, and one Louis' LaPove were on March. 1, 1935, jointly indicted of the crime of receiving stolen property, charged to have been committed on January 24 of that year, the charging part of the indictment being that said Stacey and LaPove did on that date in Multnomah county unlawfully and feloniously “buy, receive, have and conceal certain personal property, to wit: two ladies ’ coats, all being the personal property of R. M. Cray”. Prior to the trial of the defendant Stacey, LaPove pleaded guilty and was used as a witness on behalf of the state. From a judgment of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Copperman v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- State v. GoldsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. WaltersOregon Supreme Court · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Joseph L. GalloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Witters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- State v. ProudIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. CoffeyOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.