United States v. Walter Trice McKinley
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
Walter Trice McKinley was indicted for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) by possessing a Schedule I controlled substance (heroin) with intent to distribute it. His defense was entrapment. On this appeal from his conviction, McKinley makes two arguments for reversal: (1) the limits placed upon his cross-examination of the government’s primary witness deprived him of an effective cross-examination and (2) the lower court abused its discretion in not granting a mistrial after an improper statement by the same witness incurably prejudiced him. We affirm.
McKinley admitted that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Roberto Gomez-Rojas, and Michael Rece SutherlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. James P. HornadayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. Harold Donald HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Jose Demetrio Arteaga-Limones and Mike Lozano CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.