Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Trice McKinley

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1974No. 73-2882PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

Walter Trice McKinley was indicted for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) by possessing a Schedule I controlled substance (heroin) with intent to distribute it. His defense was entrapment. On this appeal from his conviction, McKinley makes two arguments for reversal: (1) the limits placed upon his cross-examination of the government’s primary witness deprived him of an effective cross-examination and (2) the lower court abused its discretion in not granting a mistrial after an improper statement by the same witness incurably prejudiced him. We affirm.

McKinley admitted that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. Roberto Gomez-Rojas, and Michael Rece SutherlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. James P. HornadayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Evans v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States v. Harold Donald HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Jose Demetrio Arteaga-Limones and Mike Lozano CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API