Legal Opinion
United States v. James P. Hornaday
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 13, 2004No. 03-13992PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
It is a federal crime to use the internet to knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), and it is also a crime to aid or abet another in committing a federal crime, 18 U.S.C. § 2. After using the internet to contact a person, who turned out to be an undercover government agent, in order to arrange for sex with two children, James Hornaday was charged by superseding indictment with violating both § 2422(b) and § 2. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a general guilty verdict.
In his…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Brenton-FarleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Philip Wayne MatheniaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.