Legal Opinion
Matthews v. Runyon
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 15, 1994No. 92-C-873PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) (“Rule 56(c)”) in the above-captioned matter. For the following reasons, his motion is granted, and this ease is dismissed.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff George Matthews, Jr. is a black male. (Compl. ¶ 3.) In July of 1989, he applied for a position as a mail handler with the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) at the Milwaukee Post Office. (PI. Mem. in Opp’n to Def. M. for Summ. J. ¶ 4; Lang Aff. ¶ 3.) On July 12, 1989, Mr.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Association of Mexican-American Educators v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- A.B. & S. Auto Service, Inc. v. South Shore Bank of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Howard v. HendersonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
- Watkins v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999